I'm a philosophy student that tends to post about really serious things unseriously and about really unserious things seriously.

I was once described as a "beautiful, intelligent iguana".

 

Deconstructing The Lulz: we-demand-serious-games: sterwood: we-demand-serious-games replied to...

metaparallax:

we-demand-serious-games:

sterwood:

we-demand-serious-games replied to your post: spookedonsemiotics replied to your post: Hey…

aaahhhh I LOVE that quote it’s the best.

Yeah, the more and more I think about it, it’s probably the only statement about Ethics in…

humm. d’you remember that post I had about ‘aesthetic commitments’ v. ontological commitments? 

this is sort of what I was talking about…..Deleuze here is the sort of statement that draws you in and makes you WANT to work it into your model, or even abandon all preexisting models and build a new one around it, because it’s BEAUTIFUL. 

and I would say that while thusly there’s a certain wariness one should assume in relation to that sort of thing, it’s not an invalid impulse AT ALL. 

to conclude, hummmm. 

“To conclude: hmmmm.”

I’m pretty sure you just locked on to my way of reading/doing philosophy.